Automatic Watch for Men - 5 Sports - Day/Date Calendar, LumiBrite Hands and Markers, and Rotating Bezel, 100m Water-Resistant

Very nice watch, good for a first watch. Very accurate, only lose about 4 seconds a day (much less than the manufacturers quoted 20). Quality watch that gets lots of compliments. All black is very sleek

Great watch! Bought as a gift for my son. Now I must get one for myself!

Great watch! The Seiko 5 Sports feels solid and stylish, perfect for daily wear. The automatic movement is reliable, the LumiBrite shines bright at night, and the rotating bezel adds a sporty touch. Water resistance works great in the pool. Feels high-quality for the price—definitely a great value.

Best watch ever. I’m happy with it in every way and I sleep with it. I work out with it. I do everything with it. I don’t have to take it off my wrist.

This is the first automatic watch I've ever bought myself. I think I had one when I was a kid, but I remember never wearing it, as digital watches were huge back then. After dozens of G-shocks and other digital watches, I got a Casio Duro dive watch a few years ago and absolutely loved it. I've been looking for an orange-dialed dive watch ever since, and as soon as I saw this Seiko, I pulled the trigger. The watch looks great - lots of style points and easy to read. I ended up changing the stock band to a black silicone one, and the watch looks less luxury and more sporty. The watch feels nice on the wrist - not too big, not too small. It's a dive watch, so no problem in the water. Complaints? It's a mechanical watch - you have to wear it or wind it every couple days or it stops. As someone who owns multiple watches and wears different ones day-to-day, this is difficult for me. I'll reach for the Seiko after not having worn it for a few days, and have to wind it and adjust the time and date - kind of a pain to do every time I want to wear it. The other bad thing? Accuracy, A mechanical watch typically varies as many seconds in a day as a quartz watch varies in a month. Even if I keep the watch wound and running every day, after a week it's off by a couple minutes. I use my watches to tell the time, not just for jewelry - so having an accurate timepiece is important to me. I still like this watch a lot, and I would recommend it to anyone interested in an entry-level Seiko. That being said, I don't think I'll be buying another mechanical watch.

Nice watch. Very attractive. Deep green color.

Sieko does it once again with a great time piece. A very high end looking watch for a fraction of the price. It’s not nicknamed blingmaster for nothing. My father had a Sieko 5 all gold version from 1980 and I wanted to buy the updated version. The 1980’s version was very classic Sieko. And Yes, this version is gaudy and really in your face with the design. But that’s the point. In regards to time keeping- it’s excellent, better than my 2017 Sieko 5 Sport and as good as my Tissot 1875. The glow in the dark functions for at least 5-6 hours which is great at night as well. Overall totally worth it if you’re looking for something eye catching and quality for a fair price.

Movement was completely unreliable and exhibited intermittent failure. Typically ran fast at 14 seconds a day but sometimes it would be 2 minutes fast per day. Yesterday it was on time and I had it fully charged and I left it at home for 8 hours while I went to work. When I came back it was 25 minutes behind so I threw it on the timegrapher and it showed that it was running 62 seconds fast. The math doesn't add up so it proves that the mechanisms inside do not work smoothly. Very disappointed in a watch that I fully expected to work out of the box. I only had it for a couple weeks. Now I am getting a Citizen quartz watch because I want something reliable and accurate. This watch left a very nasty taste in my mouth for automatic watches in general.