Fuzion Thermal Imaging Monocular Perfect for Night Hunting, High Sensitivity Thermal Monocular with Fusion Vision Heat Vision Ir Infrared Hunting monocular

Works good. I have several AGM thermals. This is my first 640. It’s is a better image than 384 but not sure if worth the price difference. LRF is decent but it doesn’t really work out past 250yds.

Have not used this "in the field" yet, but have tested it in our local area on several occasions. Ambient light on a full moon night was plenty enough for this device without an IR light. Very surprising. Super dark, you'll need the included IR light (for the night vision portion, not thermal). Thermal imaging is awesome. At one point, we looked up at a commercial jet climbing out at maybe 15,000 feet and it picked up the engines and heat signature blood red. Incredible. Can easily pick up cats, raccoons, and other small critters with the thermal. They really stand out with a good heat signature. Was amazed how far away the thermal sensing works. Firmware update went easily and flawlessly, and device easy to use. It's got lots of options that you should take the time to setup, but you don't need to do any of that to just turn it on and start using it. FYI - I also ordered an AGM thermal scope that, disappointedly, came already used. I called AGM because I was going to return it in order to get what I paid for (a brand new scope). Disclaimer: This wasn't AGM's fault - they make the scopes and vendors sell them. Anyway, AGM picked up the phone and we had an excellent conversation. She told me to keep it or return it, but either way, they will fix ANYTHING that goes wrong with the scope. She made the point repeatedly that they will stand behind their products and I could send it to them if it ever broke, and they would fix it, no questions asked. I kept it and remain impressed with that phone conversation.

Ok so I want to like this product I truly do but the number one thing I couldn’t get past is that it’s stuck at 2.5 zoom for its closest image and then can go to x8 But with it being at 2.5 it’s not something you can move around with. I was impressed with how clear the image is when close up but degrading fairly quickly with distance. The other thing I didn’t like was that the focus is always needing to be hand adjusted 🙄🫠😪for $ 1,000 I feel like I could have gotten the same thing for half the price 🫤just my opinion

Expensive, but absolutely worth the money. Good quality images and video. I can even see studs through the wall for some reason. I tried to see the studs at 2 houses and you CAN see studs, and other things behind walls (of cheaply built houses). Also good for identifying drones, planes and birds.

384x288 (50 Hz), 25 mm lensCan easily see through thick fog. But don't count on the range finder In thick fog, it is what it is.Perfect for walking and stalkingCannot complain about picture quality And i'm not new to the thermal ProductIs fairly lightweightI've never ran out a battery powerBetter than the other product that's on the market at a similar price range. Or maybe I just got a bad One. I don't know.Easy to set up manual refresh because thermals Are lazy Refresh and cold weather.Buttons and menus are easy to use AGM Makes great stuff.

Best bang for the buck! Both options work great! One battery will last for about 4 hours in normal conditions.Being using it for awhile could not be happier!

The media could not be loaded. Coyotes at about 370yds and a deer at about 300 yds. The monocular is easy to use and the quality is great, would definitely recommend!

The "thermal-optical fusion" shtick of this product seemed really cool at first glance. This is something that was unavailable at any price just a few years ago, and this device seemed like a good, budget effort. The thermal portion is great, and even the "fusion" portion is great. The problem is that the optical sensor is insanely low resolution, or maybe the display is just too low-res. I couldn't read license plates in full daylight at 30 yards with the optical camera, though I didn't look at pictures on a larger monitor to see if they were visible in image captures. It also doesn't have very good low light performance compared to the latest generation of CMOS sensors. If the optical part of this was a 4K STARVIS sensor, and the eyepiece had a slightly higher resolution, this device would be absolutely incredible. I have a feeling that the military grade thermal fusion monocular (that uses an IIT, not a CMOS) that AGM sells for nearly $10k probably is that incredible, if only due to the low light performance.One other irritating thing about this particular model is that it doesn't have a diopter adjustment for the eyepiece. The instruction manual actually references a diopter adjustment dial, but there isn't one. This seems like a pretty big oversight for a device at this price point.I look forward to the next generation of this product.